Gynecology & Obstetrics Case report Open Access

  • ISSN: 2471-8165
  • Journal h-index: 7
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.44
  • Journal Impact Factor: 2.8
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +44-7915608527

Mini Review - (2023) Volume 9, Issue 4

Tubal Ligation: A Comprehensive Exploration of a Permanent Contraceptive Method
Alison Norris*
Department of Women’s, Gender & Sexuality Studies, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA
*Correspondence: Alison Norris, Department of Women’s, Gender & Sexuality Studies, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA, Email:

Received: 28-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. IPGOCR-23-17569; Editor assigned: 30-Jun-2023, Pre QC No. IPGOCR-23-17569 (PQ); Reviewed: 11-Jul-2023, QC No. IPGOCR-23-17569 (Q); Revised: 18-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. IPGOCR-23-17569 (R); Published: 27-Jul-2023, DOI: 10.36648/2471-8165.9.4.23


Tubal ligation, commonly referred to as "getting one's tubes tied," is a surgical procedure performed to achieve permanent contraception in individuals who have decided to no longer bear children. This procedure has gained popularity due to its effectiveness and irreversibility. In this comprehensive exploration, we delve into the history, procedure, benefits, considerations and societal implications of tubal ligation. The history of tubal ligation dates back to the early 20th century, when surgical techniques were developed to permanently block or sever the fallopian tubes, thus preventing the eggs from reaching the uterus for fertilization. Over the years, the procedure evolved as medical advancements improved its safety and accessibility. In the early days, the procedure was often performed postpartum, involving a larger incision. However, modern techniques have shifted towards minimally invasive laparoscopic procedures, reducing recovery time and complications.


Tubal ligation; Hysteroscopic; Hormonal cycle


Tubal ligation can be performed through various methods, all of which aim to disrupt or block the fallopian tubes' pathways. The most common approach is the laparoscopic method, where small incisions are made in the abdomen to insert a camera and surgical instruments. The tubes can then be sealed, cut, clipped, or cauterized to prevent the eggs' passage. Another approach is the hysteroscopic method, which involves inserting a thin tube through the cervix to place a blocking device in the fallopian tubes. Tubal ligation offers several benefits, making it a preferred choice for individuals seeking permanent contraception. One of the most significant advantages is its high effectiveness rate, with a very low failure rate once the procedure is successful. This makes it a reliable choice for those who are certain about not wanting future pregnancies [1].

Literature Review

Tubal ligation is intended to be permanent and while some procedures can be reversed, success is not guaranteed, making it important to be certain about not wanting more children. Like any surgical procedure, there are risks involved, including infection, bleeding and complications related to anesthesia. Some individuals might experience regret later in life, particularly if their circumstances change. While sterilization reversal is possible in some cases, it's not always successful. Tubal ligation does not provide protection against sexually transmitted infections (STIs), so barrier methods like condoms might still be necessary. The history of tubal ligation dates back centuries, with evidence of various methods being attempted in different cultures. However, it wasn't until the mid-20th century that modern surgical techniques and advancements in medical technology led to safer and more effective procedures. Initially, the procedure was performed through a large abdominal incision, but as laparoscopy techniques improved, the procedure became less invasive and more accessible. Choosing tubal ligation is a significant decision that requires careful consideration. Factors to think about include the individual's age, overall health, personal circumstances and future reproductive plans. While tubal ligation is intended to be permanent, there are options for fertility preservation before undergoing the procedure, such as egg or embryo freezing, for those who have even the slightest uncertainty about future family planning [2].


Furthermore, tubal ligation eliminates the need for ongoing contraceptive measures, providing a sense of freedom from daily birth control routines. Unlike hormonal methods, it doesn't interfere with natural hormonal cycles, addressing concerns related to side effects. Since it doesn't affect sexual function or libido, it allows couples to continue enjoying a fulfilling sex life without any impediments. However, while tubal ligation offers numerous benefits, it's essential to consider some significant factors before undergoing the procedure. The irreversibility of the process is paramount – individuals should only opt for it if they are absolutely certain about not wanting more children. Although procedures like tubal reversal exist, they are often complex, expensive and not guaranteed to restore fertility [3].

Tubal ligation raises important ethical and societal questions. Access to this procedure can be influenced by cultural, religious and socioeconomic factors. There have been concerns about individuals being pressured into the procedure by medical professionals or family members. It's crucial for healthcare providers to ensure that individuals make informed decisions without coercion. Tubal ligation is a significant step in family planning, offering a permanent and reliable form of contraception. While it comes with both benefits and drawbacks, advancements in surgical techniques and increased awareness of reproductive options have made the procedure safer and more accessible than ever. Individuals considering tubal ligation should engage in thorough discussions with their healthcare providers, considering not only their current circumstances but also potential future scenarios. As with any medical decision, well-informed choices are crucial in ensuring the best possible outcomes for individuals and their reproductive health [4].

Tubal ligation also has societal and ethical implications, as its availability raises questions about reproductive autonomy, family planning and cultural influences. Access to permanent contraception is a crucial aspect of reproductive rights, allowing individuals to make informed decisions about their bodies and futures. However, cultural and religious factors can impact these decisions, sometimes leading to disparities in access and choices. In some cultures, there might be stigmas associated with not having children or undergoing sterilization, potentially influencing an individual's choice. It's important to foster a supportive environment that respects an individual's decision, whether it's to have a large family, a small family, or no children at all [5,6].


Tubal ligation is a significant medical advancement that provides a permanent contraceptive option for individuals who have completed their families or decided not to have children. Its historical evolution, procedural techniques, benefits and considerations make it a complex subject worthy of exploration. As society continues to evolve, conversations around reproductive autonomy, family planning and the right to make informed choices will undoubtedly remain central, ensuring that individuals have the freedom to make decisions aligned with their personal beliefs and circumstances.



Conflict of Interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.


  1. Liedman R, Hansson SR, Howe D, Igidbashian S, Russell RJ, et al. (2008) Endometrial expression of vasopressin, oxytocin and their receptors in patients with primary dysmenorrhoea and healthy volunteers at ovulation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 137(2):189-192.
  2. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  3. Westhoff C, Davis A (2000) Tubal sterilization: Focus on the US experience. Fertil Steril 73(5):913-922.
  4. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  5. Lessard-Anderson CR, Handlogten KS, Molitor RJ, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, et al. (2014) Effect of tubal sterilization technique on risk of serous epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 135(3):423-427.
  6. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  7. Madsen C, Baandrup L, Dehlendorff C, Kjær SK (2015) Tubal ligation and salpingectomy and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumors: A nationwide case–control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94(1):86-94.
  8. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  9. Rice MS, Hankinson SE, Tworoger SS (2014) Tubal ligation, hysterectomy, unilateral oophorectomy and risk of ovarian cancer in the nurses’ health studies. Fertil Steril 102(1):192-198.
  10. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  11. Cibula D, Widschwendter M, Zikan M, Dusek L (2011) Underlying mechanisms of ovarian cancer risk reduction after tubal ligation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(6):559-563.
  12. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

Citation: Norris A (2023) Tubal Ligation: A Comprehensive Exploration of a Permanent Contraceptive Method. Gynecol Obstet Case Rep. Vol.9 No.4:23.

Copyright: © Norris A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.