International Journal of Applied Science - Research and Review Open Access

  • ISSN: 2394-9988
  • Journal h-index: 10
  • Journal CiteScore: 2.27
  • Journal Impact Factor: 1.33
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days

Opinion - (2022) Volume 9, Issue 1

Measurement of Leaf Area Using a Volumetric Approach
Huge Jackson*
Department of Mathematics, University of Texas, USA
*Correspondence: Huge Jackson, Department of Mathematics, University of Texas, USA, Email:

Received: 03-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. IPIAS -22-12643; Editor assigned: 05-Mar-2022, Pre QC No. IPIAS -22-12643 (PQ); Reviewed: 19-Jan-2022, QC No. IPIAS -22-12643; Revised: 24-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. IPIAS -22-12643 (R); Published: 31-Jan-2022, DOI: 10.36648 / ipias - 9.1.48


Regarding the advances in the procedures of aberrant assessment of leaf region, the disastrous estimation approaches have still stayed as the reference and the most dependable strategies. Notwithstanding, in any event, using the advanced sensors and applications for the most part requires the relentless and tedious act of unfurling and investigating the single leaves, independently. In the current review, a volumetric methodology was tried to decide the heap leaf region in view of the proportion of leaf volume separated by thickness. For this reason, the suspension method was utilized for volumetry, which depends on the straightforward practice and computations of the Archimedes’ guideline.

The two-correspondingly broadened organ of photosynthesis has for some time been the focal point of plant researchers. As needs be, leaf region is presumably the most often estimated phenotypic element of harvest shades, which has likewise prompted advancement of a generally assorted philosophy. Despite the fact that at the present, different non-horrendous procedures and devices have been presented for assessment of leaf region and its twin idea of leaf region file, the damaging methodologies have stayed as the most reliable and the immediate technique for leaf region estimation. To be sure, even the boundaries of the non-damaging procedures are adjusted or approved in light of the horrendous techniques, which might be a difficult practice. Gregory is known as the primary analyst who announced the estimation of leaf region in 1917. He involved a ruler and celluloid protractor for in situ assessment of leaf region in view of the leaf aspects and 2D shape. Over the course of the following century, different imaginative methodologies have been utilized to work with leaf region estimation for example, in light of leaf weight gravimetric technique for example see , leaf water content , length and width or using planimetric and picture handling procedures , which in the end has reached to the period of cell phone applications . From the primary logical endeavors for straightforwardly assessment of leaf region to the cutting edge methods, regularly there has been a requirement for straightening the single leaves and breaking down them independently the training which is tedious and relentless, regardless of that the fast sensors or hardware could have been used. As an outcome, the blunder of administrator in isolating the leaves or controlling the covers may likewise emerge during region estimation of the thick example of wheat leaves collected before stem lengthening. Measurement of such functional blunders has been dismissed in the writing. The main kind of horrendous strategies which has been utilized for assessing the region of a leaf heap on the double, are the methodologies created in light of the leaf weight. Albeit solid connections between leaf region and dry or potentially new loads have been accounted for see , speculation of the came about models into different genotypes or conditions might be testing and require further investigations for changing the boundaries. To be sure, leaf weight has not an immediate or inherent numerical relationship with leaf calculation, and might be impacted by varieties in the leaf water content (especially on account of utilizing new weight), genotype, and natural circumstances.


Consequently, exact assessment of leaf region as per the weight, requires model adjustment. Besides, assurance of dry weight 74 likewise requires extra time and gear for broiler drying of the examples. It is normal that using the dependable and straightforward idea of volumetric leaf region, in view of which the estimation time may be free of test size, work with the arduous act of leaf region estimation and subsequently, work on the accuracy of field tests.

Rather than the weight, leaf volume is an immediate supporter of the leaf math and the 2D region might be determined essentially through isolating the leaf volume by its thickness. Consequently, the came about region might be autonomous of the development condition, genotype, water content, or different factors. Subsequently, the focal point of the current review was on involving this condition for working with the immediate estimation of leaf region. Huxley estimated the volume of a solitary leaf with accuracy of ± 0.01 ml, utilizing an imaginative volumeter which was made in view of fluid dislodging.


Additionally using the Archimedes rule, Hughes presented an altered rendition of hydrostatic gauging, suspension method, for accuracy volumetry of little items. He detailed that the new strategy was similarly more precise and reproducible than the other regular techniques created in light of water relocation.

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.