Gynecology & Obstetrics Case report Open Access

  • ISSN: 2471-8165
  • Journal h-index: 7
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.44
  • Journal Impact Factor: 2.8
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +44-7915608527

Mini Review - (2023) Volume 9, Issue 4

Hysterectomy: Exploring a Complex Surgical Intervention
Evelien Sandberg*
Department of Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*Correspondence: Evelien Sandberg, Department of Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Email:

Received: 28-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. IPGOCR-23-17566; Editor assigned: 30-Jun-2023, Pre QC No. IPGOCR-23-17566 (PQ); Reviewed: 11-Jul-2023, QC No. IPGOCR-23-17566 (Q); Revised: 18-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. IPGOCR-23-17566 (R); Published: 27-Jul-2023, DOI: 10.36648/2471-8165.9.4.24


A hysterectomy is a surgical procedure that involves the removal of a woman's uterus, the organ where a fetus develops during pregnancy. This medical intervention has a long history and has evolved over time to become one of the most commonly performed surgeries in women. While often necessary for medical reasons, hysterectomies can also be a source of controversy and concern due to their potential implications for a woman's physical and psychological well-being. The history of hysterectomies dates back to ancient times when rudimentary surgical techniques were employed to address gynecological issues. In the early years, the procedure was often performed out of desperation to treat a variety of ailments including pelvic pain, abnormal bleeding and even emotional disturbances.


Hysterectomy; Adenomyosis; Gynecologic cancer


These early procedures were fraught with risks and often led to complications or death due to infections and limited medical knowledge. For women who wish to retain their fertility, the idea of hysterectomy can be particularly challenging. In such cases, efforts are directed towards alternative treatments, fertility preservation strategies and uterine-conserving surgical approaches. For instance, myomectomy, a procedure to remove fibroids while leaving the uterus intact, is often considered as an alternative to hysterectomy. Additionally, advances in assisted reproductive technologies offer hope to those facing fertility concerns after hysterectomy. Hysterectomies are categorized based on the extent of organ removal. Total hysterectomy involves the removal of the entire uterus, while partial (or subtotal) hysterectomy involves the removal of the upper portion of the uterus while leaving the cervix intact [1].

Literature Review

Radical hysterectomy is a more extensive procedure, typically performed for cases of gynecologic cancer, involving the removal of the uterus, cervix, upper part of the vagina and supporting tissues. Hysterectomies are performed to treat a range of medical conditions that might not respond adequately to other treatments. Common indications include uterine fibroids, which are noncancerous growths in the uterus; endometriosis, a condition where tissue similar to the uterine lining grows outside the uterus; adenomyosis, characterized by the growth of the uterine lining into the muscular wall; and certain gynecologic cancers such as uterine, ovarian and cervical cancers. Advancements in surgical techniques have revolutionized the way hysterectomies are performed, offering options that cater to individual patient needs and conditions. Traditional open surgery involves a large abdominal incision, providing direct access to the uterus. However, minimally invasive techniques have gained prominence. Laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizes small incisions and a camera-equipped instrument for visualization [2].


Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy combines laparoscopy with robotic technology for increased precision and dexterity. Vaginal hysterectomy involves removing the uterus through the vaginal canal, eliminating external incisions. The choice of approach depends on factors such as the patient's medical history, body size and the surgeon's expertise. Like any surgical procedure, hysterectomy carries potential risks and complications. Short-term risks include infection, bleeding, anesthesia-related issues and blood clots. Long-term considerations involve the impact of the surgery on pelvic floor muscles, urinary and bowel function and sexual health. Hormonal changes post-hysterectomy might also lead to early menopause in some cases. Psychological factors, including the emotional response to the loss of reproductive capacity, should not be underestimated.

Advancements in medical understanding and surgical techniques have significantly transformed hysterectomy procedures. In the 19th century, with the development of anesthesia and aseptic techniques, hysterectomies became safer and more feasible. As medical knowledge expanded, different approaches to performing hysterectomies were devised, leading to a variety of surgical techniques. These techniques include abdominal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. The choice of technique depends on factors such as the reason for the surgery, the patient's medical history and the surgeon's expertise. The landscape of women's healthcare is constantly evolving, with a growing emphasis on patient-centered care and personalized treatment plans. Hysterectomy, while often essential, is increasingly being approached with caution. Alternative treatments and less invasive procedures are explored whenever possible to preserve the uterus and maintain reproductive options for those who desire it. Moreover, discussions surrounding hysterectomy have expanded to include in-depth conversations between patients and healthcare providers about the risks, benefits and long-term consequences of the procedure [3,4].

While a hysterectomy can bring relief from debilitating medical conditions, it can also have profound physical and psychological effects. Physical recovery time varies depending on the surgical approach used, with minimally invasive techniques typically requiring shorter recovery periods compared to traditional open surgeries. The procedure can bring about menopause if the ovaries are removed, leading to hormonal changes and associated symptoms. Psychologically, a hysterectomy can impact a woman's sense of self and femininity. The uterus is often closely linked to notions of womanhood, motherhood and identity. Its removal can evoke feelings of loss and can trigger emotional challenges. Patients might experience a range of emotions, including sadness, grief and even depression. This psychological aspect of hysterectomy underscores the importance of comprehensive pre-operative counseling and post-operative support. Hysterectomies have not been without controversy. In the past, there have been instances of unnecessary hysterectomies being performed, sometimes driven by financial incentives or misguided medical practices. This has led to calls for greater scrutiny, ethical considerations and informed consent processes to ensure that the procedure is undertaken for valid medical reasons.

Hysterectomies are carried out for a range of medical conditions, each with its own set of considerations. Some of the common reasons for undergoing a hysterectomy include uterine fibroids, endometriosis, adenomyosis, pelvic organ prolapse and certain gynecological cancers. In cases where less invasive treatments have failed or are deemed inappropriate, a hysterectomy might be the best course of action to improve the patient's quality of life and overall health. There are different types of hysterectomies that a woman may undergo, depending on the extent of organ removal. A total hysterectomy involves the removal of the uterus and cervix, while a subtotal or partial hysterectomy involves the removal of only the upper part of the uterus. In some cases, a radical hysterectomy is performed, which includes the removal of the uterus, cervix, surrounding tissue and possibly the upper part of the vagina. The choice of the type of hysterectomy depends on factors such as the underlying medical condition and the patient's fertility preferences [5,6].


In the realm of gynecological surgery, hysterectomy stands as a significant intervention with both historical roots and contemporary implications. Its evolution from risky and often futile procedures to advanced surgical techniques reflects the progress of medical science. However, the decision to undergo a hysterectomy is a complex one that requires careful consideration of medical needs, potential psychological effects and long-term consequences. As medical knowledge continues to advance, it is hoped that both the surgical techniques and the support systems surrounding hysterectomy will improve, leading to better outcomes for women's health and well-being.



Conflict of Interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.


  1. Stark M (2021) Nullius in verba–surgical manifesto for the 21st Century. JSLS 25(1). 20-25.
  2. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  3. Sandberg EM, Twijnstra AR, Driessen SR, Jansen FW (2017) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24(2):206-217.
  4. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  5. Lee SH, Oh SR, Cho YJ, Han M, Park JW, et al. (2019) Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC women's Health 19(5):1-2.
  6. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  7. Töz E, Özcan A, Apaydın N, Uyar İ, Kocakaya B, et al. (2015) Outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy and constricting colporrhaphy with concurrent levator myorrhaphy and high perineorrhaphy in women older than 75 years of age. Clin Interv Aging Jun 24(4):1009-1015.
  8. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  9. Stark M, Di Renzo GC, Benhidjeb T (2010) Natural Orifice Surgery (NOS)—Toward a single-port transdouglas approach for intra-abdominal procedures. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Feb 148(2):114-117.
  10. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  11. Stark M, Gerli S, Di Renzo GC (2009) The importance of analyzing and standardizing surgical methods. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(2):122-125.
  12. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

Citation: Sandberg E (2023) Hysterectomy: Exploring a Complex Surgical Intervention. Gynecol Obstet Case Rep. Vol.9 No.4:24.

Copyright: © Sandberg E. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.