Journal of the Pancreas Open Access

  • ISSN: 1590-8577
  • Journal h-index: 80
  • Journal CiteScore: 29.12
  • Journal Impact Factor: 19.45*
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +44 7460731551

- (2011) Volume 12, Issue 5

Chronic Calcific Pancreatitis Presenting as an Isolated Left Perinephric Abscess: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Ragesh Babu Thandassery1, Sathish Kumar Raamya Mothilal2, Shrawan Kumar Singh2, Abdul Khaliq1, Lalan Kumar1, Rashi Kochhar1, Kartar Singh1 and Rakesh Kochhar1

Departments of 1Gastroenterology and 2Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research. Chandigarh, India

*Corresponding Author:
Rakesh Kochhar
Department of Gastroenterology; Postgraduate Institute of Medical
Education and Research; Chandigarh-160012; India
Phone: +91-172.275.6617; +91-172.275.6608
Fax: +91-172.274.4401
E-mail: dr_kochhar@hotmail.com

Received June 29th, 2011 - Accepted August 15th, 2011

Visit for more related articles at Journal of the Pancreas

Abstract

Context Acute and chronic pancreatitis may present with pseudocysts in atypical locations. Activated pancreatic enzymes track along anatomic fascial planes causing digestion of the surrounding tissues and resulting in distant pseudocysts. Pseudocysts at atypical locations pose significant diagnostic as well as therapeutic challenges. Case report We report an unusual presentation of a pancreatic pseudocyst in a young male who presented with a left perinephric abscess. Percutaneous drainage was not successful in resolving the abscess and he was subsequently diagnosed as having chronic pancreatitis together with a left perinephric abscess. Needle knife sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater resulted in the gradual resolution of the abscess. Conclusion We report a rare presentation of chronic pancreatitis with a perinephric abscess and its non-surgical management. This case report indicates that any patient presenting with a perinephric abscess of unknown etiology not responding to conventional treatment modalities should be investigated for underlying pancreatitis.

Keywords

Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreatic Pseudocyst; Pancreatitis, Alcoholic; Pancreatitis, Chronic

INTRODUCTION

Acute or chronic inflammation of the pancreas can result in the development of a pseudocyst in the pancreas or in the surrounding non-pancreatic tissues [1, 2]. Pancreatic pseudocysts are organized nonepithelized fluid collections in the context of acute or chronic pancreatitis, and have been described in virtually every organ of the body depending upon where the activated pancreatic enzymes are released and what path the enzymatic digestion takes [3]. Although there is controversy over the nomenclature, a pancreatic abscess is a circumscribed intra-abdominal collection of pus, mostly occurring in relation to the pancreas, containing little or no pancreatic necrosis and arising after infection of the pseudocyst [4]. Pseudocysts at atypical locations such as the spleen, liver, mediastinum, pelvis and kidney have rarely been reported [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. They may occur in unusual locations through the spread of the pancreatic enzymes along the intra-abdominal fat planes. Pseudocysts at atypical locations pose a unique and difficult diagnostic as well as therapeutic challenge, even more so when they present as abscesses. We report an unusual presentation of a pancreatic pseudocyst in a patient who presented with a left perinephric abscess.

CASE REPORT

A 25-year-old male presented with a two-month history of dull pain in the left loin which had worsened in severity in the preceding two weeks. He also had the sensation of a lump in the left loin and a low grade fever of two months duration. He denied any history of weight loss or vomiting, or any luminal or urinary symptoms. He was a chronic alcohol abuser, consumed about 500 mL of alcoholic beverages daily for the preceding 8 years. He was initially evaluated in a peripheral hospital where he underwent an ultrasound of the abdomen which showed a left perinephric abscess for which he was referred to the Department of Urology at our hospital.

On evaluation, he was febrile (39°C) and had an 8x8 cm tender ballotable lump in the upper left abdomen. Ultrasonography of the abdomen showed a 12x8 cm left perinephric collection, and a percutaneous pig-tail catheter drain was placed under ultrasound guidance. It drained 600 mL of purulent fluid for the first two days and, thereafter, about 100 mL of hazy fluid per day. A bacterial culture of the fluid isolated alpha hemolytic Streptococci sensitive to ampicillin and amino- glycosides, and he was started on parenteral amikacin. The pig-tail catheter drain continued to drain about 100 mL fluid per day for more than 7 days although his fever subsided. A routine urine examination and a bacterial urine culture did not reveal any evidence of infection. Blood sugar was normal and HIV serology was negative. Electrocardiography and echocardiography were also normal. In view of the persistent drain output, the fluid was further investigated; the amylase level in the fluid was found to be 2,566 U/L (reference range: 20-96 U/L) and the corresponding serum amylase was 76 U/L. Contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) of the abdomen was carried out which showed dense foci of calcification in the head of the pancreas, a mildly prominent pancreatic duct with a 12.3x8.6 cm hypodense collection in the posteroinferior part of the left kidney, displacing it anteriorly and eroding its posteroinferior capsule (Figure 1). There was no evidence of fluid collection anywhere else in the abdomen. A diagnosis of chronic calcific pancreatitis with a left perinephric abscess was made and a gastroenterological opinion was sought. His serum parathyroid hormone and triglyceride levels were normal. There were no signs of pancreatic exocrine or endocrine insufficiency. He underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) but selective pancreatic ductal cannulation could not be achieved, possibly because of the dense calcification. A needle knife sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater was carried out in the direction of the 1 o’clock position, from the ampullary orifice. The patient had a reduction in drain output following this procedure. On the 11th day, the drainage stopped completely; repeat ultrasonography showed no residual collection and the pig-tail catheter drain was removed. He was asymptomatic on discharge and a follow-up CECT scan one month later showed complete resolution of the perinephric abscess (Figure 2).

pancreas-cect-abdomen-calcification

Figure 1. a. CECT abdomen showing calcification in the head of the pancreas and the left perinephric abscess. b. Coronal section showing the left perinephric abscess.

pancreas-cect-abdomen-percutaneous

Figure 2. a. CECT abdomen showing the percutaneous catheter drainage of the left perinephric abscess. b. Follow-up CECT showing resolution of the perinephric abscess.

DISCUSSION

We have described a patient with a left perinephric abscess which had possibly occurred after an episode of acute pancreatitis. The elevated amylase level suggested underlying pancreatic pathology which was confirmed on CECT. Pancreatitis results in injury to the pancreatic acinar cells, and the release of the activated digestive enzymes, amylase and lipase. This leads to local pancreatic tissue destruction and pancreatic pseudocyst formation. Infected pseudocysts and abscesses develop as a consequence of infection of the pseudocyst and have similar treatment and outcome [4]. Drainage of the enzymes along anatomic fascial planes causes digestion of the surrounding tissues and results in non-pancreatic pseudocysts. Non-pancreatic pseudocysts have been reported to occur in the mediastinum, groin and spleen, and, infrequently, in the kidney [2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. Seepage of the pancreatic enzymes beneath Gerota’s fascia into the perirenal fatty tissues, and digestion of the perirenal fat by the pancreatic enzymes possibly results in renal pseudocyst formation. Only eight cases of renal pseudocyst formation due to pancreatitis have been reported (Table 1) [8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19].

Table

In most cases, renal pseudocysts involve the left kidney, and it has been suggested that the duodenal loop acts as an anatomic barrier for the right kidney (only one report) [8]. Renal pseudocyst formation should be suspected in cases of renal collections of uncertain etiology which are not resolved with conventional treatment methods. The diagnosis can be established with ultrasonography, CECT or magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment consists of cyst drainage (pig-tail catheter drain or surgery) and/or ERCP. In seven of the eight reported cases, this was accomplished with open surgical drainage [8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. There is only one previous case of a renal pseudocyst which was successfully treated with nasopancreatic drain placement [19]. In our case, an indwelling catheter had failed to show any resolution of the perinephric abscess. However, after needle knife sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater, the drainage gradually ceased. Endoscopic sphincterotomy alone has been shown to result in the resolution of pancreatic ascites as it results in obliteration of the high pressure gradient at the pancreatic sphincter which results in the preferential drainage of the pancreatic enzymes into the duodenum similar to the management of patients with bile leaks where obliteration of the transpapillary gradient alone is satisfactory [20, 21]. In all the reported cases of renal pseudocysts, including ours, significant clinical and radiographic improvement occurred after pseudocyst drainage, and recurrence was not reported in any case. Our case report represents the first report of a perinephric abscess in relation to chronic calcific pancreatitis and also only the second such case managed non operatively.

CONCLUSION

Renal pseudocyst and abscess formation should be considered in all patients with perinephric abscesses not responding to drainage. Endoscopic sphincterotomy alone can result in complete resolution of an abscess.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest

References