Gynecology & Obstetrics Case report Open Access

  • ISSN: 2471-8165
  • Journal h-index: 7
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.44
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.48
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us 44-7723-850004

Case Report - (2020) Volume 6, Issue 2

Anaphylaxis to Cefazolin in the Second Trimester: A Case Report

Daoud BE1*, He L2, Miller R1, Chang CLN1 and Meng ML3

1Columbia University Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, New York, USA

2Columbia University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York, USA

3Duke University Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Durham, USA

Corresponding Author:
Daoud BE
Columbia University Medical Center
Department of Anesthesiology 622 West 168th Street New York
NY 10032, USA
Tel: 212-342-2028
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: March 24, 2020; Accepted Date: May 04, 2020; Published Date: May 08, 2020

Citation: Daoud BE, He L, Miller R, Chang CLN, Meng ML (2020) Anaphylaxis to Cefazolin in the Second Trimester: A Case Report. Gynecol Obstet Case Rep Vol.6 No.2:15 doi:10.36648/2471-8165.6.2.96

Visit for more related articles at Gynecology & Obstetrics Case report

Abstract

Anaphylactic reactions during pregnancy are uncommon and can trigger maternal hypotension. These hemodynamic changes increase both maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality as emergent cesarean delivery is often necessary due to worsening fetal status. Only a handful of case reports describe perioperative and intraoperative management of anaphylaxis in pregnancy. We present a patient in her second trimester with twin-twin transfusion syndrome who experienced anaphylaxis to cefazolin prior to the start of a fetoscopic laser procedure for photocoagulation of pathological placental anastomoses.

Keywords

Anaphylaxis; Second trimester; Pregnancy; Cefazolin; Allergy

Key Highlights

• Anaphylaxis in pregnancy carries a high risk of fetal morbidity and mortality.

• Immediate management is similar to that of non-pregnant women.

• Epinephrine is the first line supportive medication.

• A multidisciplinary approach is needed in the maternal resuscitation.

• There is no allergic cross reactivity between cefazolin and penicillin.

Introduction

Anaphylaxis is a rare complication during the second trimester of pregnancy. Like many diseases, pregnancy should not influence maternal treatment. Most reported cases of anaphylaxis in pregnancy occur around the time of delivery and fetal heart rate changes distress secondary to maternal hypotension often results in emergency delivery. We report the first case of maternal anaphylaxis occurring in the setting of laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), and the third known case during the second trimester of pregnancy with good maternal and fetal outcomes [1,2]. This is a case of a woman with a monochorionic, diamniotic (MCDA) twin gestation in the second trimester of pregnancy who experienced anaphylaxis due to cefazolin administration prior to the start of fetoscopic laser surgery for TTTS. The patient provided written consent for the publication of the case.

Case Report

Our patient is a 37-year-old otherwise healthy, G4P3 at 19 weeks 5 days gestational age with a MCDA twin pregnancy complicated by TTTS who presented for fetoscopic laser photocoagulation of pathological placental anastomoses. Baseline maternal heart rate was 113 beats per minute, blood pressure 90/59 mmHg, and oxygen saturation 98% on room air. Combined spinal epidural anesthesia technique was used (intrathecal doses: fentanyl 15mcg and hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5mg). Cefazolin 2g infusion was initiated. Five minutes into the infusion (1g of cefazolin given) the patient experienced itching on the face and hives were noted. Diphenhydramine 50mg IV was given. Two minutes later, the patient experienced shortness of breath, with facial edema and wheezing was appreciated on auscultation. Dexamethasone 10mg IV and epinephrine 10mcg IV were given followed by an infusion of epinephrine 0.5mcg/min. Heart rate remained at baseline of 120 beats per minute, blood pressure was 105-125/50- 60 mmHg and oxygen saturation remained 98-100% on room air. Ultrasound assessment of fetal heart rates were adequate but the donor fetal heart was noted to be hypercontractile with an irregular rhythm during the first 10 minutes of recognition of the anaphylactic response and initiation of epinephrine. Vital signs were observed for 40 minutes after the antibiotic was dosed and since she remained stable on the epinephrine infusion. As the laser procedure was urgent, the decision was made to proceed with the procedure once the patient was stabilized. The 45-minute procedure was uneventful. The hives resolved by the end of the case.

Post-operatively, epinephrine was decreased to 0.25mcg/min two hours after antibiotic dosing but the patient experienced recurrent shortness of breath, so the infusion was resumed at 0.5mcg/min for 8 more hours. The epinephrine was then reduced to 0.25mcg/min for another 4 hours. Other medications administered during recovery included famotidine 20mg IV, nalbuphine 5mg IV, diphenhydramine 50mg IV, and hydrocortisone 100mg IV. Postoperative tryptase levels were <2.0 ug/L. Epinephrine was ultimately discontinued, and the patient was observed overnight before being discharged home in the morning in stable condition.

Discussion

Anaphylaxis during pregnancy jeopardizes the life of the mother and fetus, as profound hypotension can result in maternal and fetal hypoperfusion and premature delivery that can be emergent. This is the first reported case of maternal anaphylaxis occurring in the setting of laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). Anaphylaxis in the second trimester increases fetal morbidity. This is the third reported cases of anaphylaxis during the second trimester of pregnancy with good maternal and fetal outcomes (Tables 1 and 2) [1,2]. Compared to the general perioperative population in which neuromuscular blockers are the most common cause of anaphylaxis, antibiotics are the most common cause of anaphylaxis during pregnancy [3]. Other less common causes of anaphylaxis during pregnancy are listed in Tables 1 and 2. This patient was previously exposed to cefazolin during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy without any allergic reactions. Re-exposure to an allergen can precipitate anaphylaxis. This can be worsened in pregnancy with the postulated mechanism being an increased TH2 response, a known inducer of IgE synthesis [4].

Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Medications
Intravenous Vitamins and Iron
Neuromuscular Blockers
General Anesthetics
Latex Products
Antiseptic Agents e.g. Chlorhexidine

Table 1: Causes of anaphylaxis during pregnancy.

Author Agent Gestational age at anaphylaxis event (weeks) Management Maternal Outcome Neonatal Outcome
Entman et al.  (1984) [16] Snakebite antivenin 28 Ephinephrine, steroids, isoproterenol, diphenhydramine Good Neurological damage
Luciano et al.  (1997) [17] Iron 27 Not described Good Neurological damage
Suri et al.  (1999) [18] Suxamethonium 23 Delivery at 35 weeks Good Neurologic damage
Cole et al.  (2000) [19] Laminaria 21 Antihistamines, steroids, B-agonists Good Death (elective abortion)
Vercauteren et al.  (2003) [1] Pentastarch 28 Ephedrine, ranitidine, promethazine, steroids, aminophylline; Cesarean delivery next day Good Good
Biermann et al.  (2005) [20] Suxamethonium 26 Not described Not described Not described
Berenguer et al.  (2013) [15] Amoxicillin 28 Fluids, steroids antihistamines
indomethacin, magnesium & pre-term delivery
Good Neurologic damage followed by death day of life 11
Truong et al.  (2015)21 Suxamethonium 19 Epinephrine Good Death
Tsuzuki et al.  (2017) [2] Food Allergy (Soba noodles) 25 Fluids, Epinephrine,
Antihistamine, Steroid
Good Good (no neurologic deficiency)

Table 2: Cases of anaphylaxis reported in second trimester and management and outcome.

Management of anaphylaxis in pregnant women should be similar to that of non-pregnant women with a few additional caveats (Figure 1) [5]. The first step is recognition of anaphylaxis and cessation of the triggering agent followed by airway and hemodynamic support, oxygen supplementation and fluid resuscitation. Anesthesiologists and obstetricians should be called to assist in the maternal resuscitation. Epinephrine is the vasopressor of choice in anaphylaxis because it provides bronchodilation, decreases upper airway mucosal edema, treats hypotension, provides cardiac inotropic as well as chronotropic support and suppresses further mediator release from mast cells and basophils [5]. Advanced cardiac life support should be performed if indicated regardless of pregnancy status. In contrast to non-pregnant patients, left uterine displacement is required during resuscitation or the patient should be in left tilt position to remove aortocaval compression. Endotracheal intubation may be challenging in the setting of pregnancy due to associated edema of the upper airway, tongue swelling and obscured landmarks.

gynecology-obstetrics-pregnant-patients

Figure 1: Steps in responding to anaphylaxis in pregnant patients at viable gestational ages.

At the time of allergic reaction, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology recommends collection of serum tryptase levels, plasma histamine, 24-hour urinary histamine metabolites, or urinary prostaglandin to assist in establishing a diagnosis of anaphylaxis [6]. Tryptase has a 72% sensitivity and 72% specificity, but mast cell tryptase value alone cannot be used to establish the diagnosis of anaphylaxis [7]. In our case, the tryptase value was not positive - likely because the blood sample was not sent to the lab on ice and may not have been processed properly. For women who report an allergy history, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists now supports penicillin allergy skin testing in pregnancy [8].

Appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis against surgical site infection is imperative. Antibiotic stewardship will help prevent the increased side effects, poor bacterial coverage, and increased bacterial resistance to antibiotics due to alternative antibiotic choices. Suboptimal antibiotic choice due to incompletely investigated or inappropriately documented or allergies is causing an increase in maternal infection on a population level. It behooves providers to delineate true allergies and make plans for testing as necessary and plan for appropriate second line antibiotics.

The overall prevalence of anaphylactic reaction to cephalosporin is around 0.1% to 0.0001% [9]. Initial studies of cross reactivity between penicillin and cephalosporins is suggested to be as high as 10%, but these studies were performed with early cephalosporins possibly with trace amounts of penicillin [10,11]. While penicillin and cephalosporin share a beta-lactam ring, cross reactivity is primarily determined by R1 side chain that is attached to the beta-lactam ring. There is no cross-reactivity between penicillin and cefazolin as they do not share similar R side chains [12]. Therefore, this patient could safely receive penicillin if needed without skin testing. If this patient were to need a cesarean delivery, cefazolin could be substituted by another first-generation cephalosporin with dissimilar R side chains to cefazolin, preventing cross reactivity while maintaining optimal surgical site infection prophylaxis [13]. Ceftezole is the only firstgeneration cephalosporin with similar R side chain to cefazolin and should therefore be avoid in this patient. Additionally, gentamycin with clindamycin would also be appropriate antibiotics for cesarean delivery [14]. Inappropriate alternative antibiotics are clindamycin only, gentamicin only, vancomycin or ampicillin only. Clindamycin has poor gram-negative coverage and can contribute to Clostridium difficile infection. Vancomycin can cause infusion-related red man syndrome and it has poor coverage of MSSA. Anesthesiologists play an important role in allergy assessment and management during the perioperative period and should be mindful of antibiotic stewardship and optimal antimicrobial coverage.

The importance of treating allergic reactions with epinephrine and close maternal fetal monitoring is demonstrated by the adverse outcome in a case of a pregnant woman with anaphylaxis to amoxicillin in the second trimester. She was treated with steroids and antihistamines, but not with epinephrine. Days later she delivered a severely neurologically impaired neonate who ultimately died [15-21]. Our emphasis on treating with epinephrine and maintaining maternal blood pressure and preventing maternal hypotension likely assisted in our good fetal outcome.

Conclusion

Prompt recognition and treatment of anaphylaxis resulted in complete resolution of anaphylaxis. Although uncommon, when anaphylaxis occurs during pregnancy prompt recognition and treatment is required to prevent maternal and fetal morbidity.

References