Gynecology & Obstetrics Case report Open Access

  • ISSN: 2471-8165
  • Journal h-index: 7
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.44
  • Journal Impact Factor: 2.8
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +44-7915608527

Commentary - (2023) Volume 9, Issue 4

Abortion: A Complex and Controversial Ethical Debate
Monica Dragoman*
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Columbia, Columbia, USA
*Correspondence: Monica Dragoman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Columbia, Columbia, USA, Email:

Received: 28-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. IPGOCR-23-17564; Editor assigned: 30-Jun-2023, Pre QC No. IPGOCR-23-17564 (PQ); Reviewed: 11-Jul-2023, QC No. IPGOCR-23-17564 (Q); Revised: 18-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. IPGOCR-23-17564 (R); Published: 27-Jul-2023, DOI: 10.36648/2471-8165.9.4.28


Abortion, the termination of pregnancy, has been a topic of profound ethical, social and political debate for decades. It elicits strong emotions and divergent viewpoints, reflecting deeply held beliefs about the sanctity of life, women's rights, bodily autonomy and the role of government in personal decisions. The complex nature of the abortion discourse is grounded in a myriad of factors, including cultural, religious, philosophical and scientific considerations. This essay delves into the multifaceted aspects of abortion, exploring its historical context, legal status, ethical implications and potential future developments. Abortion is not a new practice; it has been performed in various forms throughout human history. In ancient times, different societies had different attitudes toward abortion, with some considering it acceptable while others viewed it as morally objectionable [1].


The advent of modern medicine and advances in technology has transformed the abortion landscape, providing safer and more reliable methods but also intensifying the ethical debate. The historical context of abortion demonstrates its deep entanglement with cultural norms, social structures and religious beliefs. The legal status of abortion varies widely around the world. Some countries permit abortion without restrictions, while others impose strict limitations or even criminalize the practice entirely. The legal framework often reflects the prevailing societal values and political ideologies. In regions where abortion is heavily restricted or banned, proponents of reproductive rights argue that such laws infringe upon women's autonomy and bodily integrity. On the other hand, opponents of abortion contend that legalizing it undermines the sanctity of life and disregards the rights of the unborn. The heart of the abortion debate lies in the ethical considerations surrounding the status of the fetus, the rights of the pregnant woman and the responsibilities of society as a whole [2].

For instance, some branches of Christianity and Islam oppose abortion, while others allow for certain exceptions. Religious convictions can greatly influence how individuals view the morality of abortion and its place within the fabric of society. The abortion debate extends beyond personal beliefs and influences public policy decisions. Political parties often adopt differing positions on abortion and elections can be swayed by candidates' stances on this issue. The public discourse surrounding abortion encompasses not only ethical and moral arguments but also practical considerations such as healthcare accessibility, sex education, contraception availability and support systems for pregnant individuals. The abortion debate is unlikely to be resolved definitively due to its intricate nature and the deeply held convictions on both sides. However, as medical technology advances and societal attitudes evolve, new dimensions may emerge. Discussions could focus on the viability of the fetus outside the womb, the ethical implications of selective abortion based on genetic traits and the role of artificial womb technology in providing alternatives to abortion [3,4].

Proponents of abortion rights emphasize a woman's right to make decisions about her own body, asserting that forcing a woman to continue an unwanted pregnancy infringes upon her autonomy and may lead to physical, emotional and economic hardships. Those opposed to abortion often base their stance on religious beliefs, asserting that life begins at conception and therefore terminating a pregnancy is equivalent to taking a human life. One of the fundamental clashes in the abortion debate is between the right to bodily autonomy and the right to life. Advocates of bodily autonomy argue that no one should be compelled to sustain another life within their body against their will. They liken pregnancy to a unique scenario where a woman's body is directly affected and therefore, she should have the sole authority to decide its course. Proponents of the right to life, conversely, contend that the fetus is a distinct human being with its own rights and terminating its life is morally equivalent to homicide. Religious beliefs play a significant role in shaping opinions on abortion. Different religions hold diverse perspectives, often reflecting broader theological and ethical teachings [5].


Abortion remains a contentious and multifaceted topic that intertwines matters of ethics, law, religion and personal autonomy. The diverse viewpoints surrounding abortion highlight the complexity of human values and the intricate interplay between individual rights and collective responsibility. As society continues to grapple with these complex considerations, it is imperative to engage in respectful and informed conversations that take into account the myriad factors that shape this ongoing debate.



Conflict of Interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.


  1. Raymond EG, Grossman D, Weaver MA, Toti S, Winikoff B (2014) Mortality of induced abortion, other outpatient surgical procedures and common activities in the United States. Contraception 90(5):476-479.
  2. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  3. Raymond EG, Grimes DA (2012) The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 119(2):215-219.
  4. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  5. Taylor D, Upadhyay UD, Fjerstad M, Battistelli MF, Weitz TA, et al. (2017) Standardizing the classification of abortion incidents: The Procedural Abortion Incident Reporting and Surveillance (PAIRS) framework. Contraception 96(1):1-3.
  6. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  7. White K, Carroll E, Grossman D. (2015) Complications from first-trimester aspiration abortion: A systematic review of the literature. Contraception 92(5):422-438.
  8. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

  9. Blum J, Raghavan S, Dabash R, Chelli H, Hajri S, et al. (2012) Comparison of misoprostol-only and combined mifepristone–misoprostol regimens for home-based early medical abortion in Tunisia and Vietnam. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 118(2):166-171.
  10. [Google Scholar], [Crossref], [Indexed at]

Citation: Dragoman M (2023) Abortion: A Complex and Controversial Ethical Debate. Gynecol Obstet Case Rep. Vol.9 No.4:28.

Copyright: © Dragoman M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.