Journal of the Pancreas Open Access

  • ISSN: 1590-8577
  • Journal h-index: 80
  • Journal CiteScore: 29.12
  • Journal Impact Factor: 19.45*
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +44 7460731551

Conference Proceeding - (2013) Volume 14, Issue 5

37th National Congress of the "Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas" (AISP) Bologna (Italy). September 19-21, 2013

Maria Rachele Angiolini1, Francesca Gavazzi1, Cristina Ridolfi1, Paola Morelli2, Erminia Casari3, Maria Carla Tinti1, Marco Montorsi1, Alessadro Zerbi1

1Section of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Milan School of Medicine, 2Epidemiology Service, Health Department, 3Microbiology Section, Analysis Laboratory; “Humanitas” Clinical Institute, IRCCS. Rozzano, Milan, Italy

Visit for more related articles at Journal of the Pancreas

Context Cefazolin is widely accepted as routine antimicrobial prophylaxis in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. Microbial resistance to this drug is rapidly increasing, nullifying the expected beneficial effects of its administration and exposing patients to potentially severe infective complications. Objective Analysis of bile culture results and comparison with postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery in a referral centre; definition of an alternative prophylaxis schedule. Methods Between Jan 2010 and Jan 2013 we performed 170 consecutive major resections requiring abdominal bile exposure, of which 156 pancreaticoduodenectomies and 14 total pancreatectomies. We routinely performed culture on bile samples obtained intraoperatively and on drain liquid samples taken on fifth postoperative day. We then prospectively recorded data about postoperative septic complications and analyzed them consulting our referral infectious disease specialist. Results Among the 170 patients, 95 (56%) had positive bile cultures, of which 73 (43%) with multiple microbes. The great majority of microbes obtained belonged to Enterococcus Spp. (E. Faecalis 29%, E. Facium 18%), while other well represented germs were E. Coli (18%), Enterobacter Spp. (18%), Klebsiella Spp. (12%). Eighty patients (47%) received preoperative biliary stenting, which resulted strongly associated with bile infection (100% vs. 17%, P<0.001). Bile infection was associated with higher morbidity both in patient with stent (72% vs. 56%, P=0.037), and without stent (87% vs. 56%, P=0.026). Forty-seven (49%) of infected bile samples harbored microbes resistant to cefazolin; in these patient postoperative infective complication rate was significantly higher (61% vs. 39%, P=0.016) than in patients that did not harbor. The rate of cefazolin resistant microbe identification was even higher on drain samples (58%), which shared microbes with previous bile sample in 80% of cases, even though it was not associated with higher morbidity. Analyzing antimicrobial susceptibility of these germs we identify the association ampicillin-sulbactam as a new possible drug for perioperative prophylaxis. Conclusions Infective complications in pancreatic surgery could lead to severe consequences. Adequate antimicrobial prophylaxis, selected using epidemiological evidence from patients samples, is mandatory. Ampicillin-sulbactam could be a viable alternative to cefazolin in surgical procedures involving abdomen bile exposure, although further studies are necessary to validate this drug benefits.