Quality in Primary Care Open Access

  • ISSN: 1479-1064
  • Journal h-index: 27
  • Journal CiteScore: 6.64
  • Journal Impact Factor: 4.22
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +32 25889658

Abstract

Assessing risk by analysing signi�?�?��?½cant events in primary care

Jill Murie

Risk assessment in one local healthcare cooperative (LHCC) was conducted by applying a national incident grading matrix (CNORIS) to 56 signi�?�?��?½ cant event analyses (SEAs) undertaken by 32/39 (82%) general practitioners (GPs) as a voluntary and educational activity.Analysis demonstrated a ratio of ‘near miss’ to actual adverse event of 1:6 and a wide range and combination of categories. In 40% of incidents reported, the severity was assessed to be ‘major’ or ‘catastrophic’. In 78% of incidents, the risk of recurrence was considered ‘possible’, ‘likely’ or ‘almost certain’. Risk assessment for recurrence of incidents was described as ‘high’ in 25%, ‘moderate’ in 31% and ‘low’ in 44% of cases.The study demonstrates that GPs can work within a national framework for risk assessment.However, the process identi�?�?��?½ ed a need for consistency in terms of de�?�?��?½ nitions and coding, dedicated software, a managed reporting system, practical guidance and possibly incentives for GPs