Articles published in Quality in Primary Care have been cited by esteemed scholars and scientists all around the world. Quality in Primary Care has got h-index 29, which means every article in Quality in Primary Care has got 29 average citations.
Following are the list of articles that have cited the articles published in Quality in Primary Care.
2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total published articles |
40 | 41 | 63 | 58 | 21 | 24 | 21 |
Research, Review articles and Editorials |
20 | 33 | 13 | 22 | 11 | 9 | 18 |
Research communications, Review communications, Editorial communications, Case reports and Commentary |
0 | 8 | 47 | 33 | 8 | 10 | 0 |
Conference proceedings |
0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 22 |
Citations received as per Google Scholar, other indexing platforms and portals |
155 | 194 | 253 | 272 | 312 | 277 | 272 |
Journal total citations count | 3516 |
Journal impact factor | 4.22 |
Journal 5 years impact factor | 7.36 |
Journal cite score | 6.64 |
Journal h-index | 29 |
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101.
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101.
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101.
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101.
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101.
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101.
BE TM, FRNZCGP CR, FACLM JK (2010) Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: Comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Quality in primary care 18: 93-101.
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92.
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92.
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92.
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92.
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92.
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92.
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92.
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92.
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92.
Heim S (2010) Views of German general practitioners on the clinical indicators of the British Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Quality in primary care 18: 85-92.
FAChPM GM, BMath DS (2010) Addressing the needs of caregivers of cancer patients in general practice: a complex intervention. Quality in primary care 18: 9-16.
FAChPM GM, BMath DS (2010) Addressing the needs of caregivers of cancer patients in general practice: a complex intervention. Quality in primary care 18: 9-16.
FAChPM GM, BMath DS (2010) Addressing the needs of caregivers of cancer patients in general practice: a complex intervention. Quality in primary care 18: 9-16.