Journal of Oral Medicine Open Access

  • Journal h-index: 4
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.32
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.27
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +32 25889658

Commentary - (2022) Volume 6, Issue 1

Characterization of dental dentures surface antimicrobial procedures
Shen Hu*
 
1Department of Oral Biology and Medicine, University of California, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center,, USA
 
*Correspondence: Shen Hu, Department of Oral Biology and Medicine, University of California, USA, Tel: +1225644490, Email:

Received: 29-Dec-2021, Manuscript No. ipom-22-12630; Editor assigned: 31-Dec-2021, Pre QC No. ipom-22-12630 (PQ); Reviewed: 14-Jan-2022, QC No. ipom-22-12630; Revised: 21-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. ipom-22-12630 (R); Published: 28-Jan-2022, DOI: 10.36648/ipom.6.1.140

Description

Since Bran mark embed framework was created in 1965, dental inserts have been generally researched and quick-created to turn into a full-grown procedure for supplanting lost teeth. Presently, the dental implant has been known as “the third pair of human teeth”. Ever, an assortment of embed materials has been utilized, including various metals and their amalgams, fired materials, polymer materials, composite materials, etc. Among them, unadulterated titanium (containing almost 100% titanium content) and titanium composite has turned into the most ideal decision because of their great biocompatibility, optimal mechanical property, and high erosion opposition capacity. Subsequently, titanium and titanium composite has turned into the broadly involved embed materials in medication.

One fundamental difficulty of titanium inserts is microbes’ related disease for their drawn-out use. Regardless of their great biocompatibility, titanium and titanium amalgam are bio-latent materials, which have no antimicrobial properties. Microbes are not difficult to stick on their surface to frame microscopic organisms clone in oral climate and afterward lead to peri-embed contamination. Along these lines, it is important to enrich the embedded surface with antimicrobial properties to oppose microorganisms incited disease. At the same time, the amazing biocompatibility for Osseo reconciliation of titanium inserts ought to be kept up with.

Numerous procedures have been investigated to supply titanium embed surfaces with impressive antimicrobial properties and they can be generally characterized into two classifications, surface change and surface covering. The antimicrobial surface covering typically alludes to the extra layer on the embed surface which can really forestall microscopic organisms’ attachment on the embed surface, or kill microbes by delivering antimicrobial substances or particles, and afterward accomplish an antimicrobial impact. The layers incorporate ionic antibacterial covering, anti-toxin and natural antimicrobial covering, and antibacterial transporters. Though antimicrobial surface alteration ordinarily alludes to changing the organic qualities of the first embed surface to apply antimicrobial ability by either physical or synthetic techniques, yet with no extra layer on the embed surface. The natural attributes to be changed incorporate surface free energy, surface charge, hydrophobicity, harshness, and different qualities. To get the ideal surface antimicrobial property, the above procedures are applied separately or with a blend of at least two strategies.

The impacts of antimicrobial coatings on titanium embed surfaces chiefly depend on antimicrobial components or mixtures in the covering, which can be isolated into three gatherings: ionic antibacterial covering, anti-toxin and natural antimicrobial covering, and antibacterial transporters.

In this, unique surface antimicrobial strategies of titanium inserts, including antimicrobial covering and surface alterations, are checked on and late exploration progress is depicted. These strategies typically apply antimicrobial impacts by hindering microscopic organisms’ grip, declining biofilm arrangement, hindering cell digestion and breath, and upsetting bacterial divider and cell film, which in the end, lead to cell demise. Promising outcomes both in vitro and in vivo have been acquired recommending their extraordinary potential for future clinical application. Besides, these procedures ordinarily include composite materials, nanotechnology, bioengineering, and multidisciplinary combinations, all of which demonstrate a conceivable leap forward around here soon. Albeit much headway has been acquired around here, there are still a few issues. The vast majority of these strategies are currently at the research facility stage and their dependability, biocompatibility, long haul impact against bacterial in vivo, and other likely damage to the human body should be additionally clarified before their utilization for the human body.

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the journal editor and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.