Biomarkers Journal Open Access

  • ISSN: 2472-1646
  • Journal h-index: 9
  • Journal CiteScore: 1.05
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.69
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +32 25889658

Review Article - (2016) Volume 2, Issue 2

Advances in Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Technology and Its Necessity to Detect Helminth Infections: An Overview

Debraj Biswal*

Chandernagore College, Chandernagore, Hooghly, West Bengal, India

*Corresponding Author:

Debraj Biswal
Assistant Professor of Zoology (WBES)
Chandernagore College, Chandernagore
Hooghly, West Bengal, India
Tel: +91 9432150191
Email: debhraj@gmail.com

Received Date: April 15, 2016; Accepted Date: April 30, 2016; Published Date: May 6, 2016

Citation: Biswal D. Advances in Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Technology and its Necessity to Detect Helminth Infections: An Overview. Biomark J. 2016, 2:7. doi: 10.21767/2472-1646.100015

Copyright: © 2016 Biswal D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Biomarkers Journal

Introduction

Use of nucleic acid (NA) markers in clinical diagnosis of infections is rapidly making its way in the clinics and has vast potentialities of improvement of medical facilities for the common man. The traditional methods of diagnosis often leads to erroneous results since the clinical signs of many infections are mostly non-specific and may have multiple sources of origin [1]. Proper treatment depends on proper diagnosis of the disease. The lack of accuracy in the diagnostic methods cost human lives and high rates of morbidity in endemic populations around the world [2]. The situation becomes more serious in case of helminth infections because the identification of helminths has its own complexities. The helminths are usually identified from the eggs or any body part (like the segments of proglottids in cestodes) extruded along with the faeces of the definitive host. However, the eggs and/or the body parts in many cases appear to be similar and create confusions in their proper identification. The eggs of Taenia spp., for example, appear very similar and identification beyond the generic level becomes almost impossible leading to doubtful results [3]. Traditional parasitological diagnostic techniques like Kato-Katz assay for counting eggs in faeces, though inexpensive, lack specificity and sensitivity [4]. An added disadvantage is that the morpho-anatomical characteristics of the helminths reportedly vary with age, development and physiological modifications that augment the confusions [5]. In many cases, as in Diphyllobothrium infections, the entire worm is not available for identification [6]. The intermediate stages of the helminths are also not easily available. They remain encysted in the internal organs of the intermediate hosts and cannot be obtained for antemortem diagnosis [2]. The serology-based diagnostic techniques also come with disadvantages like cross-reactivity and false-positive results [7]. Molecular diagnostic tools provide an effective alternative to these traditional methods and are much higher in specificity and sensitivity [8]. Parasitic DNA serves as molecular biomarkers and has been exploited by the modern technologies to detect their presence in the human host [9]. Human clinical samples like sera [10], plasma [11], urine [12] and faeces [13] have been used to detect the presence of parasitic DNA. However, most of these techniques heavily use the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) that is extremely expensive and can rarely be afforded by the lower income group countries. Therefore, development of costeffective rapid and sensitive technique is a necessity to provide the benefits of molecular technologies to the common man. Loop mediated isothermal amplification technique (LAMP) seems to be a hope to make molecular technologies feasible to everyone.

The current paper presents a short review on the development of many aspects of LAMP since its inception to the current integration of LAMP on lab-on-a-chip (LOC) device. It also briefly discusses its applicability in various fields. Finally its importance in detection of helminth infections have been analysed considering the dearth of research in the field.

Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification (Lamp) Technique and Its Developments

The LAMP technique initially developed by Notomi et al. [14] employed a DNA polymerase and a set of four primers (two inner and two outer primers) that recognised six distinct sequences of the target DNA. The DNA sample (containing the target sequence) and the four primers were at first denatured by heat followed by rapid cooling on ice [14]. The LAMP reaction was then initiated by adding Bst DNA polymerase large fragment [It is the portion of Bacillus stearothermophilus DNA polymerase protein containing the 5’→3’ polymerase activity but lacking the 5’→3’ exonuclease activity] and the process was carried out for 1 h. at 65°C [14]. The reaction began with the binding of of the inner primers containing sequences of the sense and anti-sense strands of the target DNA [14]. This was followed by strand displacement DNA synthesis by the outer primers. Subsequently, the cyclical amplification and elongation and recycling lead to the amplification of the target sequence [14]. LAMP can also be done on a RNA target using reverse transcriptase and Bst polymerase [14].

Perhaps the best part of LAMP is that it can easily be modified and the modifications done so far have only made it more and more handy and simple. This has given a direction for LAMP to be developed for use in resource-limited settings following the ASSURED guidelines of World Health Organisation (WHO) {“Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, Userfriendly, Rapid and Robust, Equipment free, Deliverable to end users” [1]}.

Simplification in isolation of the DNA

Considerable works have been done to reduce the elaborate and multi-step procedure of DNA isolation and its purification. Qiao et al. [15] extracted DNA from Bacillus anthracis by boiling the bacteria at 95°C to 100°C for about 30 min in sterile water. They found that it was sufficient for the LAMP reaction. Hatano et al. [16] however applied the phenol and chloroform method for the extraction of DNA from Bacillus anthracis. Grab et al. [17] added detergents to the clinical samples like blood and cerebrospinal fluid to increase the sensitivity of detection of trypanosomiasis infection by the LAMP method. Mikita et al. [18] developed the direct boil-LAMP method for the detection of cutaneous leishmaniasis infections. Sriworarat et al. [19] also utilized the direct boil-LAMP method for detection of Leishmania infection in which clinical samples like blood, saliva or tissue biopsies (collected from patients with cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis) were boiled for 10 min and directly introduced into the LAMP reaction mixture omitting the purification of DNA. The method followed by Mikita et al. [18] and Sriworarat et al. [19], using crude DNA, did not affect the result. The method was proposed to be used in mass screening programmes in endemic regions with low resource settings [18, 19]. Dhumpa et al. [20] demonstrated that magnetic beads could efficiently extract DNA from biological samples with high selectivity and sensitivity. Sun et al. [21] went a step further and investigated whether the magnetic beads used for DNA extraction in any way had inhibitory effects on the LAMP reaction. In order to test this they carried out the LAMP amplification in the presence of magnetic beads at various concentrations and found that the beads did not have any inhibitory effect on LAMP reaction. The use of magnetic beads for DNA extraction had many other advantages as well. Sun et al. [21] devised a highly mobile single chambered lab-on-a-chip (LOC) system where the magnetic bead – DNA complex could be washed and the LAMP reaction mixture could be directly added for amplification and detection of the target gene. Earlier attempts to develop such LOC systems employing LAMP reactions were found to be complicated [22] and utilised two separate chambers for DNA purification and DNA amplification [23]. This not only increased the size of the set-up due to additional pumps and fluid transfer system but also added to its cost [21]. All these limitations on the practical applicability of the LAMP-based LOC system were overcome by the single chambered chip of Sun et al. [21].

Detection of the LAMP products

The detection of the LAMP products by electrophoreses and blotting techniques used by Notomi et al. [14] has come a long way to its current visual detection techniques. Mori et al. [24] utilized the turbidity developed in the LAMP reaction mixture by a white precipitate of magnesium pyrophosphate as the indicator of a positive LAMP reaction. Absence of turbidity indicated a negative LAMP reaction [24]. The pyrophosphate was obtained as a by-product in the LAMP amplification process and the formation of an insoluble salt by combination of the pyrophosphate with a divalent metallic ion like magnesium ion (Mg++) was the principle underlying the development of turbidity [24]. As the increase in turbidity of the reaction mixture was correlated with the formation of the pyrophosphate precipitate which in turn depended upon the amount of DNA synthesized, real time monitoring of the LAMP reaction could easily be attained by measurement of turbidity using a real-time turbidimeter [25]. However, it was later observed that addition of the extra divalent metal ion for increasing the amount of precipitate could affect the specificity of the reaction [26]. Tomita et al. [27] suggested the use of calcein, a fluorescent metal indicator, added in the reaction mixture could enhance the visual detection of LAMP reaction by the alteration of fluorescence intensity (measured by UV irradiation) during the course of reaction. Other fluorescence dye of similar nature is hydroxyl naphthol blue [28]. Intercalating dyes like ethidium bromide [29] and PicoGreen [30] have also been used as detection agents for the LAMP amplification products. Malachite Green has been successfully used in colorimetric LAMP approaches for detection of Leishmania spp. [31] and Plasmodium spp. [32]. Use of fluorescent dyes like SYBR Green [33] that needs to be added to the reaction mixture after the reaction has its own shortcomings as it may lead to contamination when the tubes are opened to add the dye [28]. The fluorescent dyes are limited in their application because they can bind nonspecifically even to the primers leading to erroneous interpretation of results [28]. The specificity of the LAMP product detection could be increased by addition of fluorescent molecular beacon probe targeted to an internal sequence of the amplicons [34]. Use of lateral flow dipstick format devised by Njiru [35] could also help in minimizing nonspecific signals. The inhibitory effects of several fluorescence dyes on LAMP reaction was assessed by Sun et al. [21]. The experiments performed by Sun et al. [21] showed that SYTO-24, SYBR Safe, SYBR Green and Eva Green were not suitable to be used in real time LAMP. SYTO-82 could be used as an indicator but it had disadvantages of high background noise [21]. Sun et al. [21] strongly advocated the use of SYTO-62 as the fluorescent indicator in real time LAMP.

The methods that depend on visual detection of LAMP amplification products utilises optical-electrical devices for getting the result outputs that are bulky and expensive [36]. This handicaps the production of a gene chip [36]. The detection of DNA by electrochemical methods has been proposed to be a better alternative in this regard [37]. The cyclic voltammetry method has been found to have high specificity for DNA detection using a gene chip [36]. It has also been proposed to be faster and cheaper allowing measurements under varied experimental conditions [38]. Considering all these factors Jiang et al. [36] strongly advocated the use of cyclic voltammetry for the electrochemical detection of DNA. The principle of this technique lies in the fact that combination of the DNA amplification products with a positive dye like crystal violet or methylene blue reduces the oxidation peak current (ipA) and reduction peak current (ipC), these changes of ipA/ipC are proportional to the amounts of DNA amplification products and can be measured by an electrode helping in the quantitative detection of DNA [36]. Cyclic voltammetry method was reported to have high specificity, sensitivity and accuracy. It was found to have good anti-interference ability against Aspirin and Vitamin C within the sample [36]. All these features enable electrochemical detection of DNA to be used in gene-chips or other such small-sized portable devices for field studies [36].

Power source for LAMP

The power source for operation of the LAMP set up under field conditions was the most essential and challenging part of its development because it heavily relied on use of electricity to run the test. This posed many difficulties for its operation in field conditions and in places with poor/no electricity supply. Hatano et al. [16] came up with pocket-warmer LAMP in a Styrofoam box which was highly mobile and sensitive. The pocket-warmer act as a source of heat for LAMP and therefore does not depend on electricity [16]. This property enabled it to be used for field studies [16]. Though the device was developed for anthrax detection (Bacillus anthracis) it may be used for detection of infectious diseases in areas lacking proper electricity infrastructures [16]. Dominguez et al. [34] used a PortaTherm phase-change incubator for maintenance of a stable, constant temperature of 37°C for an interference gamma release assay. The PortaTherm was based on using substances that change their phase from solid to liquid (and vice versa) at a constant phase-change temperature that is maintained until the phase change has been completed [34]. Dominguez et al. [34] utilized a substance (the substance was not specified in their paper) with a phase-change temperature of 37°C that was packed in plastic bags, heated in a water bath and cooled till crystals had just started to form when the plastic bags were placed in an insulated chamber like a Styrofoam box. This constituted the PortaTherm and could maintain a stable temperature of 37°C for about four days if it was not opened [34]. This low-cost, portable, insulated incubator was a good alternative to electricity and could be used in field studies [34]. LaBarre et al. [1] utilized an engineered exothermal chemical heating unit for maintenance of constant temperatures that is an essential pre-requisite for isothermal nucleic acid amplification. The engineered exothermal chemical heating unit consisted of calcium oxide (CaO) and an engineered phase change material (EPCM) (not specified in the paper) [1]. The principle of heat generation lied in the fact that after the heat from the CaO reaction begins to melt the EPCM, the extra heat generated in the exothermic reaction is converted into the latent heat of fusion of the EPCM [1]. When the CaO reaction reaches equilibrium the latent heat (acting as an energy source) helps in keeping the two-phase EPCM at the desired temperature until the solidification has been completed [1]. Other experiments performed showed that use of only CaO as the heat-source when compared with CaO-EPCM interface, the later was found to be more effective in proper temperature control [1]. An added advantage of the prototype was that highly pure CaO need not be used which cut the costs greatly and made it much cheaper [1]. LaBarre et al. [1] also highlighted the fact that the LAMP reagents used could be dried in the reactiontubes that could help omit using a freezer for transport and storage thereby eliminating the use of yet another energysource. The ESE Quant Tube Scanner has been proposed to be a very suitable and portable device using rechargeable batteries as the energy source [28]. Other advantages of the device were that the products could be detected after a singlestep amplification using software installed in a laptop and was small and light in weight [28]. Njiru [28] also proposed the use of rechargeable solar batteries as alternative energy-source. According to Njiru [28] sodium acetate was non-toxic and could easily be recharged by simple boiling in water allowing it to be reused more than once, therefore sodium acetate heat pads when packed in proper insulated units could serve as a good energy source for LAMP reactions. Sun et al. [21] utilised rechargeable batteries as energy source in their experiments.

Primers and their design

The conventional LAMP technique developed by Notomi et al. [14] utilised four primers (two inner and two outer) and a DNA polymerase with strand displacement activity. A more rapid form of the technique was later developed by Nagamine et al. [39]. The technique was the same as conventional LAMP with additional loop primers that could bind to additional sites (stem-loops) that could not be accessed by the inner primers [39]. Application of the loop primers could reduce the LAMP reaction time to almost half of the conventional LAMP technique [39]. This rapid form of LAMP found various clinical applications like rapid detection of periodontopathic bacteria (Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia and Treponema denticola) by Yoshida et al. [40] and rapid detection of Enterococcus faecalis in infected root canals by Kato et al. [41].

The design of the primers is also very simple. They can easily be designed online by the primer design support software: https://primerexplorer.jp/e/ [42].

Applications of LAMP

Since its advent, LAMP has found applications in various fields. LAMP has been successfully used to determine sex of pre-implantation bovine embryos that can be used for the development of animal husbandry [43]. A similar experiment performed by Khamlor et al. [44] also used LAMP in determining sex of bovine embryos before embryo transfer and opined that it could help in increasing the number of animals of the desired sex and boost the animal industry. Use of LAMP to fight bioterrorism (like the anthrax bacteria, Bacillus anthracis) has been highlighted by Hatano et al. [16]. Iwamoto et al. [45] utilised LAMP for the rapid detection of Mycobaterium tuberculosis complex from clinical sputum samples. Kouzaki et al. [46] utilised LAMP reaction to differentiate between Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Mycobacterium bovis strain from other Mycobaterium tuberculosis complexes. BCG is used as attenuated vaccine against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and as a prophylaxis against bladder cancer [46]. It causes infectious diseases in immuno-suppressed patients which necessitates the differentiation between BCG M. bovis strain and other Mycobaterium tuberculosis complexes [46].

The reverse transcriptase LAMP method has also been devised that have been used for the detection of subtype of H7N9 avian influenza virus [47]. The method could detect the presence of H7N9 avian influenza virus RNA in clinical samples of chickens, pigeons, human, drinking water, soil and cloacal/ tracheal swabs [47]. The reverse transcriptase LAMP also finds application in detection of metastasis of gastric cancer [48] and other similar oncological cases [49].

LAMP has found important applications even in determination of pathogens in food [50] and detection of genetically modified ingredients in domestic and imported foods [51].

The LAMP technology has also been used for detection of various parasitic infections like malaria [52,53] and leishmaniasis [19]. Fernández-Soto et al. [9] applied the technique to detect Schistosoma mansoni infections from faecal and sera samples of infected mice. LAMP has been employed for the differentiation of different species of Taenia (T. solium, T. solium, T. asiatica) from eggs in stool samples [54] and detection of Necator americanus infections from human stool samples [8]. Song et al. [55] successfully used a microfluidic chip LAMP (LOC-LAMP) device to detect the presence of Schistosoma mansoni in an infected mice host. An important point needs to be mentioned here is that there is dearth of works related to application of LAMP in the detection of helminth infection though helminths are one of the major causes of morbidity in the developing parts of the world [2]. Apart from this, there are various complexities involved in identification of helminths [2-4], which makes molecular technologies more reliable, sensitive and specific for proper antemortem diagnosis of helminth infection. The routine clinical diagnostic techniques used for helminth infections are also not reliable leading to wrong treatments and survival of the helminths in unsuspecting populations [8]. The LAMP integrated on a gene chip (like the one used by Song et al. [55]) can also be used in field assays of meat samples (like beef and pork) to screen for the presence of developmental stages of the helminths (like the cysticercus stages) and act as a form of food security. Proper researches in this field are still lacking and are necessary to combat the helminth burden throughout the world.

Conclusion

The development of molecular technologies was a boon for the humans because it could be used to detect and diagnose various infections easily and efficiently. Making the diagnostic techniques patient-centric was the main aim behind the advent of point-of-care-test kits [22]. The main requirements for such kits/devices were small size, light weight, easy to operate and reusability following the ASSURED guidelines laid down by the World Health Organisation (WHO) [1]. LAMP has many advantages: (i) it can amplify DNA without being affected by the presence of non-target DNA enabling crude DNA to be used in such studies, (ii) DNA amplification takes place at isothermal conditions making the process independent of the use of the expensive thermal cyclers, simple heating devices could fulfil the temperature requirement, (iii) the detection of the LAMP amplification products is very simple (turbidity, fluorescence or electrochemical detection) and not necessarily depend on elaborate processes like electrophoresis, (iv) isolation of DNA for LAMP could be simplified like direct boiling in sterile water or use of magnetic beads, and last but not the least (v) the process is also applicable to RNA by using reverse transcriptase enzymes. All these advantages together with the efforts of workers around the world could help it develop into microfluidic system based lab-on-a-chip device. The use of cyclic voltammetry for the quantitative detection of DNA by electrochemical methods [36] helps to do away with the bulky and heavy optical devices to see the result. This was indeed an important step towards the development of small sized lab-ona- chip device. The contribution of Sun et al. [21] in this field towards the development of a single-chambered simplified LOC system for DNA purification and amplification is also praise-worthy. Efforts of researchers like Hatano et al. [16] and LaBarre et al. [1] towards development of alternative energy devices for LAMP to make it independent of electricity also cannot be neglected. Loopamp Malaria Pan/Pf detection kits used by Cook et al. [53] and Sema et al. [56] for mass diagnosis of malaria was a major step towards non-instrumented nucleic acid amplification by LAMP (NINA-LAMP). NINA-LAMP utilise electricity-free heaters. However, as already mentioned, the development of such kits for diagnosis of helminth infections is also necessary considering lack of enough research in the field. Such kits will be extremely useful for mass screening of helminth infections in endemic populations and taking suitable control measures. They can also be used to test water, soil, plant and animal products for the presence of developmental stages (eggs/larvae) of the helminths and prevent its transmission. It will not only be important to humans but also to livestock and zoo-animals that are important reservoirs of helminthes around the world.

References

  1. LaBarre P, Hawkins KR, Gerlach J, Wilmoth J, Beddoe A, et al. (2011) A simple inexpensive device for nucleic acid amplification without electricity-toward instrument-free molecular diagnostics in low-resource settings. Plos One 2011: e19738.
  2. Alemu S, Kemal J, Muktar Y, Terefe G (2015) Immunological and molecular diagnostic tests for cestodes and metacestodes: Review. World ApplSci J 33: 1867-1879.
  3. Thanchomnang T, Tantrawatpan C, Intapan PM, Sanpool O, Janwan P, et al. (2014) Rapid molecular identification of human taeniidcestodes by pyrosequencing approach. Plos One 9: e100611.
  4. Berhe N, Medhin G, Erko B, Smith T, Gedamu S, et al. (2004) Variations in helminthfaecal egg counts in Kato-Katz thick smears and their implications in assessing infection status with Schistosomamansoni. Acta trop 92: 205–212.
  5. Dick TA, Poole BC (1985) Identification of Diphyllobothriumdendriticum and Diphyllobothriumlatum from freshwater fishes of central Canada. Can J Zool63: 196-201.
  6. Stunkard HW (1965) Variation and criteria for generic and specific determination of diphyllobothriidcestodes. J Helminthol 39: 281-296.
  7. Doenhoff MJ, Chiodini PL, Hamilton JV (2004) Specific and sensitive diagnosis of schistosome infection: can it be done with antibodies? Trends Parasitol 20: 35–39.
  8. Mugambi RM, Agola EL, Mwangi IN, Kinyua J, Shiraho EA, et al. (2015) Development and evaluation of a Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) technique for the detection of hookworm (Necatoramericanus) infection in fecal samples. Parasit Vectors 8: 574.
  9. Fernández-Soto P, Arahuetes JG, Hernández AS, Abán L, Santiago BV, et al. (2014) A Loop-Mediated Isotherrmal Amplification (LAMP) Assay for early detection of Schistosomamansoni in stool samples: A diagnostic approach in a murine model. PLoSNegl Trop Dis 8: e3126.
  10. Pontes LA, Dias-Neto E, Rabello A (2002) Detection by polymerase chain reaction of Schistosomamansoni DNA in human serum and feces. Am J Trop Med Hyg 66: 157–162.
  11. Wichmann D, Panning M, Quack T, Kramme S, Burchard GD, et al. (2009) Diagnosing schistosomiasis by detection of cell-free parasite DNA in human plasma. PlosNegl Trop Dis 3: 422.
  12. Sandoval N, Siles-Lucas M, Pe´rez-Arellano JL, Carranza C, Puente S, et al. (2006) A new PCR-based approach for the specific amplification of DNA from different Schistosoma species applicable to human urine samples. Parasitology 133: 581–587.
  13. Gobert GN, Chai M, Duke M, McManus DP (2005) Copro-PCR based detection of Schistosoma eggs using mitochondrial DNA markers. Mol Cell Prob 19: 250–254.
  14. Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, et al. (2000) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 28: E63.
  15. Qiao YM, Guo YC, Zhang XE, Zhou YF, Zhang ZP, et al. (2007) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for rapid detection of Bacillus anthracis spores. BiotechnolLett. 29: 1939-1946.
  16. Hatano B, Maki T, Obara T, Fukumoto H, Hagisawa K, et al. (2010) LAMP using a disposable pocket warmer for anthrax detection, a highly mobile and reliable method for antibioterrorism. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases 63: 36–40.
  17. Grab DJ, Nikolskaia OV, Inoue N, Thekisoe OM, Morrison LJ, et al. (2011) Using detergent to enhance detection sensitivity of african trypanosomes in human csf and blood by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). PlosNegl Trop Dis 5: e1249.
  18. Mikita K, Maeda T, Yoshikawa S, Ono T, Miyahira Y, (2016) The direct boil-LAMP method: a simple and rapid diagnositic method for cutaneous leishmaniasis. ParasitolInt 63: 785–789.
  19. Sriworarat C, Phumee A, Mungthin M, Leelayoova S, Siriyasatien P (2015) Development of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for simple detection of Leishmania infection. Parasit Vectors 8: 591.
  20. Dhumpa R, Handberg KJ, Jorgensen PH, Yi S, Wolff A (2011) Rapid detection of avian influenza virus in chicken fecal samples by immunomagnetic capture reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay. DiagnMicrobiol Infect Dis 69: 258–265.
  21. Sun Y, Quyen TL, Hung TQ, Chin WH, Wolff A, et al. (2015) A lab-on-a-chip system with integrated sample preparation and loop-mediated isothermal amplification for rapid and quantitative detection of Salmonella spp. in food samples. Lab Chip 15: 1898-1904.
  22. Foudeh A, Fatanat-Didar T, Veres T, Tabrizian M (2012) Microfluidic designs and techniques using lab-on-a-chip devices for pathogen detection for point-of-care diagnostics. Lab Chip 12: 3249-3266.
  23. Bu M, Perch-Nielsen IR, Sorensen KS, Skov J, Sun Y, et al. (2013) A temperature control method for shortening thermal cycling time to achieve rapid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in a disposable polymer microfluidic device. J MicromechMicroeng 23: 074002.
  24. Mori Y, Nagamine K, Tomita N, Notomi T (2001) Detection of loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction by turbidity derived from magnesium pyrophosphate formation. BiochemBiophys Res Commun 289: 150–154.
  25. Mori Y, Kitao M, Tomita N, Notomi T (2004) Real-time turbidimetry of LAMP reaction for quantifying template DNA. J BiochemBiophys Methods 59: 145–157.
  26. Njiru ZK, Mikosza ASJ, Matovu E, Enyaru JCK, Ouma JO, et al. (2008) African trypanosomiasis: Sensitive and rapid detection of the sub-genus Trypanozoon by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of parasite DNA. Int J Parasitol 38: 589–599.
  27. Tomita N, Mori Y, Kanda H, Notomi T (2008) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of gene sequences and simple visual detection of products. Nature Protocols 3: 877–882.
  28. Njiru ZK (2012) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification technology: Towards Point of Care Diagnostics. PLoSNegl Trop Dis 6: e1572.
  29. Pham HM, Nakajima C, Ohashi K, Onuma M (2005) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for rapid detection of Newcastle disease virus. J ClinMicrobiol 43: 1646-1650.
  30. Tsai SM, Chan KW, Hsu WL, Chang TJ, Wong ML, et al. (2009) Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification for rapid detection of orf virus. J Virol Methods 157: 200-204.
  31. Nzelu CO, Cáceres AG, Guerrero-Quincho S, Tineo-Villafuerte E, Rodriquez-Delfin L, et al. (2016) A rapid molecular diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis by colorimetric malachite green-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) combined with an FTA card as a direct sampling tool. Acta Trop 153: 116–119.
  32. Lucchi NW, Ljolje D, Silva-Flannery L, Udhayakumar V (2016) Use of malachite green-loop mediated isothermal amplification for detection of Plasmodium spp. Parasites. Plos One 11: e0151437.
  33. Njiru ZK, Mikosza ASJ, Armstrong T, Enyaru JC, Ndung'u JM, Thompson ARC (2008) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (lamp) method for rapid detection of Trypanosomabruceirhodesiense. PlosNegl Trop Dis 2: e147.
  34. Dominguez M, Smith A, Luna G, Brady MF, Austin-Breneman J, et al. (2010) The MIT D-lab electricity-free PortaTherm incubator for remote testing with the QuantiFERON -TB Gold In-Tube assay. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 14: 1468-1474.
  35. Njiru ZK (2011) Rapid and sensitive detection of human African trypanosomiasis by loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with a lateral-flow dipstick. DiagnMicrobiol Infect Dis 69: 205–209.
  36. Jiang D, Xiang G, Liu C, Yu J, Liu L, Pu X (2012) Development of a cyclic voltammetry method for dna electrochemical detection on microfluidic gene chip. Int J ElectrochemSci 7: 10607-10619.
  37. Del Carlo M, Di Marcello M, Giuliani M, Sergi M, Pepe A, Compagnone D (2012) Detection of benzopyrenephotodegradation products using DNA electrochemical sensors. BiosensBioelectron 31:270-276.
  38. Arteaga JF, Ruiz-Montoya M, Palma A, Alonso-Garrido G, Pintado S, et al. (2012) Comparison of the simple cyclic voltammetry (CV) and DPPH assays for the determination of antioxidant capacity of active principles. Molecules 17: 5126 -5138.
  39. Nagamine K, Hase T, Notomi T (2002) Accelerated reaction by loop-mediated isothermal amplification using loop primers. Mol Cell Probes 16: 223–229.
  40. Yoshida A, Nagashima S, Ansai T, Tachibana M, Kato H, et al. (2005) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for rapid detection of the periondontopathic bacteria Porphyromonagingivalis, Tannerella forsythia and Treponemadenticola. J ClinMicrobiol 43: 2418-2424.
  41. Kato H, Yoshida A, Ansai T, Watari H, Notomi T, et al. (2007) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for the rapid detection of Enterococcus faecalis in infected root canals. Oral MicrobiolImmunol 22: 131-135.
  42. Notomi T, Mori Y, Tomita N, Kanda H (2015) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): principle, features, and future prospects. J Microbiol 53: 1-5.
  43. Hirayama H, Kageyama S, Moriyasu S, Sawai K, Onoe S, et al. (2004) Rapid sexing of bovine preimplantation embryos using loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Theriogenology 62: 887-896.
  44. Khamlor T, Pongpiachan P, Parnpai R, Punyawai K, Sangsritavong, et al. (2015) Bovine embryo sex determination by multiplex loop-mediated isothermal ampli?cation. Theriogenology 83: 891-896.
  45. Iwamoto T, Sonobe T, Hayashi K (2003) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex M. avium and M. intracellulare in sputum samples. J ClinMicrobiol 41: 2616-2622.
  46. Kouzaki Y, Maeda T, Sasaki H, Tamura S, Hamamoto T, et al. (2015) A simple and rapid identification method for Mycobacterium bovis BCG with loop-mediated lsothermal amplification. Plos One 10: e0133759.
  47. Bao H, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Xu X, Shi J, et al. (2014) Development of a reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for the rapid detection of subtype H7N9 avian influenza virus. BioMed Res Int 2014: 525064.
  48. Horibe D, Ochiai T, Shimada H, Tomonaga T, Nomura F, et al. (2007) Rapid detection of metastasis of gastric cancer using reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Int J Cancer 120: 1063-1069.
  49. Yoneda A, Taniguchi K, Torashima Y, Susumu S, Kanetaka K, et al. (2001) The detection of gastric cancer cells in intraoperative peritoneal lavage using the reverse transcription--loop-mediated isothermal amplification method. J Surg Res 187: e1-e6.
  50. Law JWF, AbMutalib NS, Chan KG, Lee LH (2014) Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations. Front Microbiol 5: 770.
  51. Li Q, Fang J, Liu X, Xi X, Li M, Gong Y, et al. (2013) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method for rapid detection of cry1Ab gene in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.). Eur Food Res Technol 236: 589-598.
  52. Hopkins H, González IJ, Polley SD, Angutoko P, Ategeka J, et al. (2013) Highly sensitive detection of malaria parasitemia in a malaria-endemic setting: performance of a new loop-mediated isothermal amplification kit in a remote clinic in uganda. J Infect Dis 208: 645-652.
  53. Cook J, Aydin-Schmidt B, González IJ, Bell D, Edlund E, et al. (2015) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for point-of-care detection of asymptomatic low-density malaria parasite carriers in Zanzibar. Malar J 14: 43.
  54. Nkouawa A, Sako Y, NakaoM, Nakaya K, Ito A (2009) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for differentiation and rapid detection of taenia species. J ClinMicrobiol 47: 168-174.
  55. Song J, Liu C, Bais S, Mauk MG, Bau HH, et al. (2015) Molecular detection of schistosome infections with a disposable microfluidic cassette. Plosnegl trop Dis 9: e0004318.
  56. Sema M, Alemu A, Bayih AG, Getie S, Getnet G, et al. (2015) Evaluation of non-instrumented nucleic acid amplification by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (NINA-LAMP) for the diagnosis of malaria in Northwest Ethiopia Malar J 14: 44.